The National Audit Office has lauded the UK emissions trading scheme (UKETS) as a "pioneering initiative with significant achievements".1 Its report confirms many of the scheme's flaws - but pulls its punches on crucial issues such as over-allocation to key participants, the interface with pollution control regulations and the difficulty of meshing the scheme with the new EU emissions trading framework. Meanwhile, a handful of participants are accumulating a vast surplus of allowances - swamping the market and undermining the drive to reduce energy use under the climate change agreements (CCAs).
The full text of this article is only available to current registered subscribers and free trialists.
Subscribe for full access
or Sign up for a free trial subscription.
Already subscribe but don't have a password?
Activate your web account here.
Further information:
ENDS does not hold any responsibility for the content of external sites
Categories:
- Carbon & Energy Efficiency;
- Regulation;
- Energy Production & Climate;
- Climate change;
- Chemicals & polymers;
- Energy;
- National Audit Office;
- Sussex University;
- DuPont;
- Rhodia;
- BP plc;
- Ineos Fluor;
- House of Commons Public Accounts Committee;
- UK Emissions Trading Group;
- Evolution Markets;
- INVISTA Performance Technologies;
- Byrne O'Cleirigh





