The voluntary market for carbon offsets is attracting increasing attention, with a growing number of companies using it to engage consumers. So far, rumbles of discontent from environmental groups over the credibility of offsets - particularly those relying on forestry projects - have made little impact on companies' enthusiasm for the approach. But as the market grows, so do the risks of harm to credibility. Offset suppliers are finding it difficult to demonstrate that schemes would not have gone ahead without their funding. Another challenge for the voluntary market is the availability of officially certified - and cheaper - credits under the EU emissions trading scheme and Kyoto Protocol.
The full text of this article is only available to current registered subscribers and free trialists.
Subscribe for full access
or Sign up for a free trial subscription.
Already subscribe but don't have a password?
Activate your web account here.
Categories:
- Carbon & Energy Efficiency;
- Energy Production & Climate;
- Climate change;
- Agriculture, forestry and fishing;
- Royal Society;
- Advertising Standards Authority;
- Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment;
- WWF;
- Scottish Power plc;
- BT Group plc;
- Volvo Car Corporation;
- Future Forests;
- Barclays Plc;
- BP plc;
- Climate Care;
- Avis Car Rental;
- Sustainable Asset Management Group;
- CO2e.com;
- Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management;
- World Bank;
- Climate Group;
- The Corner House;
- CarbonNeutral Newcastle;
- Prima Klima;
- Lancashire Rural Futures;
- Borders Forest Trust;
- Northumberland Forest Trust;
- 500 PPM;
- Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Conventions;
- Business for Climate





