ENDS Report 382, November 2006, pp. 26-29
23 November 2006
So many companies are investing in biofuels, it has been compared to the gold rush. But given the questionable greenhouse gas benefits of some of the available products, shouldn’t we already be incentivising the second generation? As the first commercial plant nears completion, Alex Marshall investigates
The full text of this article is only available to current registered subscribers and free trialists.
Subscribe for full access
or Sign up for a free trial subscription.
Already subscribe but don't have a password?
Activate your web account here.
Categories:
- Carbon & Energy Efficiency;
- Agriculture & forestry;
- Biomass and biofuels;
- Energy Production & Climate;
- Climate change;
- Energy;
- Shell;
- Lurgi AG;
- DuPont;
- Volkswagen AG;
- House of Commons Environment Committee;
- Iogen Corporation;
- ADM [USE Archer Daniels Midland Company];
- Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership;
- Novozymes;
- Genencor International B V;
- Renewable Energy Association;
- European Commission Joint Research Centre;
- Choren Industries GmbH;
- University of California, Berkeley;
- University of Minnesota;
- Worldwatch Institute;
- Abengoa Bioenergy Corp.;
- US Department of Energy;
- Goldman Sachs;
- Brion Corporation;
- Chevron Corporation;
- Neste Oil Corporation;
- OMV Aktiengesellschaft
