ENDS Report 404, September 2008, pp. 34-37
23 September 2008
In response to public pressure, private equity firms are starting to consider the environmental impacts of their investments, says James Richens. But an ENDS survey finds vague declarations of good intent greatly outweigh firm green goals and targets
The full text of this article is only available to current registered subscribers and free trialists.
Subscribe for full access
or Sign up for a free trial subscription.
Already subscribe but don't have a password?
Activate your web account here.
Further information:
ENDS does not hold any responsibility for the content of external sites
Categories:
- Carbon & Energy Efficiency;
- Waste & Recycling;
- Green Strategy;
- Corporate responsibility;
- Reporting;
- Energy Production & Climate;
- Nuclear power;
- Energy;
- Construction, civil engineering and property;
- Retail & wholesale;
- Travel, transport & distribution;
- Environmental Defense Fund;
- AA;
- TXU;
- Waste Recycling Group Limited;
- Birds Eye Walls;
- Boots Group PLC;
- Somerfield Limited;
- UK Social Investment Forum;
- Henderson Global Investors;
- Morley Fund Management;
- 3i;
- Shanks;
- Tarkett Sommer;
- Insight Investment Management Limited;
- Cognis;
- Univerisities Superannuation Scheme;
- New Look;
- Doughty Hanson;
- Bridgepoint;
- Close Brothers Group plc;
- Terra Firma Capital Partners Ltd;
- Montagu Private Equity Limited;
- Kohlberg Kravis Roberts;
- British Private Equity and Venture Capital Association;
- Apax;
- Permira;
- Pantheon Partners;
- Venture Production Ltd;
- Energy Future Holdings;
- Luminent;
- Tianrui Group Cement;
- Infinis;
- AWAS;
- Pegasus Aircraft Finance;
- 20:20 Mobile Ltd;
- Saga;
- Gala Coral;
- Jet Aviation;
- Bordoschem;
- Duke Street Partners
