Cash for contaminated land

Sixty-four local authorities have been offered financial support for investigating and cleaning up contaminated land at 139 sites. Extra grant-in-aid is also being made available to the Environment Agency to address water pollution problems at nine contaminated sites.

The funding for local authorities takes the form of supplementary credit approvals (SCAs) authorising them to borrow money for capital expenditure in excess of their basic credit approvals. Operating only in England, the programme enables councils to investigate and carry out remedial works at sites which they own, or to which they have contributed contamination - such as private landfills - or where they have a responsibility to take action but the costs cannot be recovered from liable parties.

Priority in awarding SCAs is given to sites believed to pose a significant risk to human health or the environment. Most of the money awarded to date has been spent on former landfills.

This year, the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions' budget for the programme is £15 million, and initial allocations were announced in a parliamentary answer in May.

1 The largest has gone to Newcastle City Council, with £793,000 for three sites. Seven other authorities have been allocated more than £0.5 million. As last year, the authority with the largest number of sites covered by its SCA is Sandwell in the West Midlands, receiving £524,000 in respect of 16 sites.

The SCA awards announced in May totalled only £10.2 million. Some funding bids to the DETR are still being discussed with local authorities. Nevertheless, the awards made to date are much lower than the £17.6 million allocation made this time last year.

Last year, the Environment Agency received extra grant-in-aid of £0.5 million for the first time to deal with contaminated sites. The money is being spent at six sites - landfills and manufacturing sites - causing water pollution by solvents, pesticides and other chemicals (ENDS Report 275, pp 7-8 ). This year's allocation is £1.29 million to cover nine sites.

  • Correction: Last December, in a report on the Agency's contaminated land programme, we said that one of the six sites involved was a former pesticides plant run by a now defunct company, Berpul Products. Berpul, an adhesives manufacturer, has asked us to point out that it is alive and well and that the contamination was caused bya previous occupant of the site, Bugges Insecticides. Berpul vacated the site in 1988 after being acquired by BPB, and the site remains in the hands of the firm's previous owners, Condon & Salter Partnership.
  • Please sign in or register to continue.

    Sign in to continue reading

    Having trouble signing in?

    Contact Customer Support at
    report@ends.co.uk
    or call 020 8267 8120

    Subscribe for full access

    or Register for limited access

    Already subscribe but don't have a password?
    Activate your web account here