Why Natural England was forced to bear the bulk of the cost of a SSSI prosecution

Why was Natural England only able to recoup 0.5% of the funds it spent pursuing a two-year investigation that led to a successful prosecution of a farmer who had laid a track through a protected site without the regulator’s consent? James Agyepong-Parsons investigates

On a mountain bike ride in Yorkshire on New Year’s Day in 2017, Natural England’s lead adviser for protected sites, Justine Nelson, noticed a newly-excavated track heading down into the ancient woodland of a protected site of special scientific interest (SSSI).

Details of Nelson’s discovery and the two-year investigation that followed are contained in an internal DEFRA group memo leaked to ENDS. The investigation led to a prosecution for Brian Eddon, a farmer from Pickering, who had illegally levelled a mire and built the track across one hectare of the Newtondale SSSI – a 925.5 hectare protected site valued for its post-glacial valley landscape comprising woodland, grassland, fen, valley mire and moorland edge.

Please sign in or register to continue.

Sign in to continue reading

Having trouble signing in?

Contact Customer Support at
or call 020 8267 8120

Subscribe for full access

or Register for limited access

Already subscribe but don't have a password?
Activate your web account here