Why a ‘modest but meaningful’ contribution to conservation can legally trump human rights to property
When a fishing company challenged a government catch ban on sandeel, it argued that it contravened proprietors’ human rights to peaceful enjoyment of possessions. The conclusion the judge came to points to a move towards the environment taking more of a priority in the courts, writes Laura Tainsh.
Sign in to continue
Need to activate your subscription?
Already a subscriber
If you haven't already, activate your subscription here>>
Company Domain Access
If your company or university has a corporate subscription simply register your email address here to gain access